Archon Gold
Apr 24, 03:02 PM
It probably just means that the iMac is not functional, as in Apple Technicians made it out of spare parts.
Skorpion24
Feb 14, 05:47 AM
Latest ;)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1003206/Screenshot%20%E2%80%A2%20Preview/BlurredPreview.png (http://Skorpion24.deviantart.com/art/Blurred-197393332)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1003206/Screenshot%20%E2%80%A2%20Preview/BlurredPreview.png (http://Skorpion24.deviantart.com/art/Blurred-197393332)
dukebound85
Jan 11, 01:37 AM
a good article about diesel and the US
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/diesel/4330313
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/diesel/4330313
mikeschmeee
Apr 5, 02:49 PM
Here are photos from the other car show I went to over the weekend...
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5054/5585210493_51f7b10f7a.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585210493/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5148/5585798714_4e39e50364.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585798714/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5109/5585794288_d59d18f455.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585794288/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5145/5585789284_989a72eeae.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585789284/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5227/5585190871_97268bdd14.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585190871/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5011/5585185413_7f8b567eea.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585185413/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5305/5585773988_c99f61bfa2.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585773988/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5171/5585174833_678974dc26.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585174833/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5012/5585170045_f271c69f42.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585170045/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/5584488268_b45c97ebbb.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584488268/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/5584485532_43d0c54aa6.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584485532/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5291/5584481166_14616d2c78.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584481166/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5060/5583871607_9ed1a49bd8.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583871607/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5016/5583868473_16bef9495a.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583868473/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5189/5583866705_5468e07ce6.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583866705/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5097/5584453814_41779556d2.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584453814/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5109/5583858687_3bf182f02f.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583858687/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5099/5584445086_47ec26fc03.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584445086/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5308/5583852771_e1fbbd39c4.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583852771/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5185/5583848703_c7f96033ec.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583848703/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5054/5585210493_51f7b10f7a.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585210493/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5148/5585798714_4e39e50364.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585798714/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5109/5585794288_d59d18f455.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585794288/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5145/5585789284_989a72eeae.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585789284/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5227/5585190871_97268bdd14.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585190871/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5011/5585185413_7f8b567eea.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585185413/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5305/5585773988_c99f61bfa2.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585773988/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5171/5585174833_678974dc26.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585174833/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5012/5585170045_f271c69f42.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5585170045/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/5584488268_b45c97ebbb.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584488268/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/5584485532_43d0c54aa6.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584485532/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5291/5584481166_14616d2c78.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584481166/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5060/5583871607_9ed1a49bd8.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583871607/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5016/5583868473_16bef9495a.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583868473/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5189/5583866705_5468e07ce6.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583866705/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5097/5584453814_41779556d2.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584453814/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5109/5583858687_3bf182f02f.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583858687/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5099/5584445086_47ec26fc03.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5584445086/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5308/5583852771_e1fbbd39c4.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583852771/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5185/5583848703_c7f96033ec.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5583848703/)
more...
lmalave
Nov 20, 02:56 PM
Sweet. But, there's more to just piggybacking on your mac's airport connection to make calls. I think more has to be done to make this networking possible.
There are already wi-fi enabled phones that can make Skype calls if you have a wi-fi connection. This is nothing new or groundbreaking.
Well this certainly beats that ipod integration nonsense. MP3 player phones are a dime a dozen, I'd rather see great communication device that take how the user communicates to the next level, not just stuff a music player in it.
MP3 player phones are a dime a dozen and also *hugely* popular. Look at how well the LG Chocolate is doing with their craptacular phone. The iPhone *must* have iPod integration to be a success, IMO. At minimum it must have seamless iPod integration and a decent-to-good phone experience. Everything else is gravy.
Many manufacturers already do this with their unlocked phones - but they just store the settings on the phones (no need to connect to a computer).
Manufacturers selling unlocked phones is common elsewhere and is now already beginning in the States.
This won't fly - usage is terrible and would make dialing slower than it currently is. And texting would truly suck.
In fact, Sony launched their w800i phone unlocked in the U.S. (was only availalbe from the Sony Style store). The thing is, at $500 it was extremely cost-prohibitive and definitely aimed at technology early adopters. I'm sorry, but phones are just too darn expensive at full retail price. Apple *needs* the subsidy for signing a new contract. That's the only thing that will make the price competitive for the mass market. I expect Apple will partner with T-Mobile and/or Cingular, and that the phone will be available for no more than $300 with new contract (and even that is expensive by today's standards).
Do you mean latency? evdo gives up to 3mbps in urban areas. That should be plenty.
EV-DO is not available on GSM networks in the US. As far as I know the GSM providers (basically T-Mobile and Cingular) are using HSDPA for their 3G network. And everything I've heard about it has been good. The early reports on the Cingular 3G network are that it's quite zippy and handles streaming video just fine...
I also like the idea of using the click wheel to make a retro style digital-rotary phone. However, I doubt Apple would just display the numbers on the screen and not on the unit. So when in dial mode, you would spin the click wheel and the numbers, displayed on the display in a circle, would highlight the number that you were on and then click the center button on the click wheel to select. If you wanted to get really old school, you could have the rotary sounds come through the headphones. Or course you would still be able to dial by your address book or search through a downloaded version of the white or yellow pages (which would naturally sync into your phone whenever you charge it at home, via blue tooth or direct connection to your computer).
Text messaging is extremely popular and I just don't see Apple crippling text messaging on the iPhone. Can you see inputting a 120-character text message on a "rotary-style" interface? Yeah, I can't either. Any kind of rotary interface on the iPhone is a non-starter idea, IMO.
P.S. The title of this thread is: "iChat Phone from Apple?". Kind of implies that there must be as simple, fast way to input text, right? I'm thinking a full qwerty keyboard is a definite possibility...
There are already wi-fi enabled phones that can make Skype calls if you have a wi-fi connection. This is nothing new or groundbreaking.
Well this certainly beats that ipod integration nonsense. MP3 player phones are a dime a dozen, I'd rather see great communication device that take how the user communicates to the next level, not just stuff a music player in it.
MP3 player phones are a dime a dozen and also *hugely* popular. Look at how well the LG Chocolate is doing with their craptacular phone. The iPhone *must* have iPod integration to be a success, IMO. At minimum it must have seamless iPod integration and a decent-to-good phone experience. Everything else is gravy.
Many manufacturers already do this with their unlocked phones - but they just store the settings on the phones (no need to connect to a computer).
Manufacturers selling unlocked phones is common elsewhere and is now already beginning in the States.
This won't fly - usage is terrible and would make dialing slower than it currently is. And texting would truly suck.
In fact, Sony launched their w800i phone unlocked in the U.S. (was only availalbe from the Sony Style store). The thing is, at $500 it was extremely cost-prohibitive and definitely aimed at technology early adopters. I'm sorry, but phones are just too darn expensive at full retail price. Apple *needs* the subsidy for signing a new contract. That's the only thing that will make the price competitive for the mass market. I expect Apple will partner with T-Mobile and/or Cingular, and that the phone will be available for no more than $300 with new contract (and even that is expensive by today's standards).
Do you mean latency? evdo gives up to 3mbps in urban areas. That should be plenty.
EV-DO is not available on GSM networks in the US. As far as I know the GSM providers (basically T-Mobile and Cingular) are using HSDPA for their 3G network. And everything I've heard about it has been good. The early reports on the Cingular 3G network are that it's quite zippy and handles streaming video just fine...
I also like the idea of using the click wheel to make a retro style digital-rotary phone. However, I doubt Apple would just display the numbers on the screen and not on the unit. So when in dial mode, you would spin the click wheel and the numbers, displayed on the display in a circle, would highlight the number that you were on and then click the center button on the click wheel to select. If you wanted to get really old school, you could have the rotary sounds come through the headphones. Or course you would still be able to dial by your address book or search through a downloaded version of the white or yellow pages (which would naturally sync into your phone whenever you charge it at home, via blue tooth or direct connection to your computer).
Text messaging is extremely popular and I just don't see Apple crippling text messaging on the iPhone. Can you see inputting a 120-character text message on a "rotary-style" interface? Yeah, I can't either. Any kind of rotary interface on the iPhone is a non-starter idea, IMO.
P.S. The title of this thread is: "iChat Phone from Apple?". Kind of implies that there must be as simple, fast way to input text, right? I'm thinking a full qwerty keyboard is a definite possibility...
Stampyhead
Sep 25, 11:45 PM
Check out the reviews on amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001BRIEY/qid=1127709778/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-3144106-0376830?v=glance&s=pc&n=507846)
Sounds like some people liked it, others said they got curly paper.
Sounds like some people liked it, others said they got curly paper.
more...
redAPPLE
Sep 30, 03:14 PM
there is still lotus notes? unbelievable. i know people use it. but i thought they are still using the outdated version.
vniow
Oct 22, 01:39 AM
http://www.rx7club.com/forum/images/smilies/wtf.gif
more...
applehockey
Feb 9, 03:17 PM
The requirements for Unlimited Mobile to Any Mobile are the following:
background (palm trees and
more...
The school has palm trees!
Article : Palm Trees:
more...
without its palm trees.
Palm trees amp; crossing the road
more...
Palm tree island
Palm trees have been used as
more...
Snow on Palm Trees
free vector palm trees
Free Palm Tree Picture
Sydde
Mar 16, 01:18 AM
extradite 'em to Texas :D
We will just exile them to eastern Ontario ;)
We will just exile them to eastern Ontario ;)
more...
bottsjw
Apr 28, 07:13 AM
Seems like a good reason to open up sales to other carriers. VZ for six months to do what they can then T-Mobile and Sprint to help boost the numbers before iP5.
lOUDsCREAMEr
Nov 20, 05:35 PM
Shaw Wu Is Super Lame
more...
chicagdan
Jan 9, 03:22 PM
This is my first time witnessing a live Macworld. I made the switch early last year and have become more addicted since. I was hoping for an update to the Mac Pro. A price drop, Cores maybe. Some More Juiciness about Leopard. I think the iPhone is really cool! I'm not that interested tho. I'm happy for everyone that has been dreaming of one.
I found the announcement of the name change to be scary. Obviously this keynote is a good example of how they are dropping the "computer" focus on the company. Which is kinda cool in a way but scary too. Just when I start getting into this whole thing they switch focus? I hope this isn't as bad as I think it could be.
I'm voted on disappointed but I am not totally bummed. I still think it was a great keynote. And I still think Steve and Apple are "Wicked cool". I can't wait to see the video.:cool:
My fellow Chicago mac user makes a good point ... I too found the name change disconcerting. It seems like Steve is setting us up for a time in the near future when OS-X will be set free to appear on any Intel box and Apple will stop making computers, focusing instead on OS-X based entertainment and communications devices. Mac World isn't even about the Mac anymore.
But still, there will be many, many more Steve announcement keynotes this year ... there's the Leopard/iWork/iLife release still to come. There will be WWDC. Will we have Mac-based keynotes anymore? Maybe not. Now that they've shifted to Intel and there's no surprise left, unless a new form factor is introduced, changes may come regularly and quietly.
I found the announcement of the name change to be scary. Obviously this keynote is a good example of how they are dropping the "computer" focus on the company. Which is kinda cool in a way but scary too. Just when I start getting into this whole thing they switch focus? I hope this isn't as bad as I think it could be.
I'm voted on disappointed but I am not totally bummed. I still think it was a great keynote. And I still think Steve and Apple are "Wicked cool". I can't wait to see the video.:cool:
My fellow Chicago mac user makes a good point ... I too found the name change disconcerting. It seems like Steve is setting us up for a time in the near future when OS-X will be set free to appear on any Intel box and Apple will stop making computers, focusing instead on OS-X based entertainment and communications devices. Mac World isn't even about the Mac anymore.
But still, there will be many, many more Steve announcement keynotes this year ... there's the Leopard/iWork/iLife release still to come. There will be WWDC. Will we have Mac-based keynotes anymore? Maybe not. Now that they've shifted to Intel and there's no surprise left, unless a new form factor is introduced, changes may come regularly and quietly.
RobNYC
Apr 7, 12:56 PM
The thing is, all these games are available for free online for your mac. I suppose if you want to play them on your ipad or phone that's one thing. If that doesn't matter, you can get your nostalgia for free. Same goes for NES, Coleco, Super NES, and Genesis emulators.
more...
Autopulated
Feb 7, 12:34 PM
Nyc
Sweet shot; your own?
Sweet shot; your own?
SandboxGeneral
Mar 20, 07:28 AM
I don't have any horror stories, but at the end of this year I am going to drop two of the sites I maintain because of an extremely annoying woman. I do a site for her, and an association she is involved with plus many other sites for local governments, like townships.
All of my clients are easy to work with and give me periodic things to update, fix or add. That's never a problem for me since they're paying for it. But this woman sends me things nearly everyday to do, wanting to change font sizes, add giant gaudy stars and attention grabbers and the like. She's one of those people who uses 15 question marks or other punctuation in her emails to express her tone or meaning. Oftentimes she want the exact same information that is on one page to be on another page, "just in case people don't click on the first page." I keep telling her that it is redundant to do so and people aren't as dumb as you think they are. Essentially she is a micromanager of her site and she also has authority over the association site I maintain too. So I get the same stuff from her for that one too.
But wait! There's more! She also feels the need to send things to me for another site she has no business giving input towards (it's an association site her husband belongs to!) and offers her opinion to change things there too. This one really drives me nuts. She sent some changes to me a few months ago and CC'd the person with authority over this site. I ignored her request and subsequently so did the other guy. Then last week she FW's it to me again with giant font and multiple question marks wanting to know why I didn't do anything with it. I replied back saying that I was waiting for "Hank" to authorize it. So she fires an email off to him and I demanding that he authorize me to make the changes. Wouldn't you know it, he ignored her again! ;) I told the associations president and he is going to put a stop to her trying to mess with his site.
But as I said, I am dropping her site and her association site at the end of the year. I don't need her money that bad. Living headache free and a bit lighter in the wallet is OK with me.
All of my clients are easy to work with and give me periodic things to update, fix or add. That's never a problem for me since they're paying for it. But this woman sends me things nearly everyday to do, wanting to change font sizes, add giant gaudy stars and attention grabbers and the like. She's one of those people who uses 15 question marks or other punctuation in her emails to express her tone or meaning. Oftentimes she want the exact same information that is on one page to be on another page, "just in case people don't click on the first page." I keep telling her that it is redundant to do so and people aren't as dumb as you think they are. Essentially she is a micromanager of her site and she also has authority over the association site I maintain too. So I get the same stuff from her for that one too.
But wait! There's more! She also feels the need to send things to me for another site she has no business giving input towards (it's an association site her husband belongs to!) and offers her opinion to change things there too. This one really drives me nuts. She sent some changes to me a few months ago and CC'd the person with authority over this site. I ignored her request and subsequently so did the other guy. Then last week she FW's it to me again with giant font and multiple question marks wanting to know why I didn't do anything with it. I replied back saying that I was waiting for "Hank" to authorize it. So she fires an email off to him and I demanding that he authorize me to make the changes. Wouldn't you know it, he ignored her again! ;) I told the associations president and he is going to put a stop to her trying to mess with his site.
But as I said, I am dropping her site and her association site at the end of the year. I don't need her money that bad. Living headache free and a bit lighter in the wallet is OK with me.
more...
Bern
Sep 24, 06:02 PM
If you're 18 and living under your parent's roof then you are obliged to follow their rules. Ok so you're legally an adult at 18, then quit leaching from your parents, reaping the rewards of living in their house, enjoying their hospitality and get your own place. But as long as you continue to take advantage of the good will of your parents hospitality then you follow the rules of their home.
Simple!
Simple!
Wedged
Apr 3, 10:51 PM
Really liked how this turned out.
Original - Source (http://www.deviantart.com/download/203367387/concept_by_relhom-d3d2va3.jpg)
sorry for the noob question, but how did you get the text dock? looks awesome!
Original - Source (http://www.deviantart.com/download/203367387/concept_by_relhom-d3d2va3.jpg)
sorry for the noob question, but how did you get the text dock? looks awesome!
Frisco
Sep 26, 01:40 PM
Hi! I was thinking of buying an Apple iBook SE 366 MHZ G3 processor , 64 MB Ram off of ebay. Does anyone know if it has a DVD drive and how much RAM it can handle?
Frisco
Frisco
eternlgladiator
Mar 26, 08:56 PM
EPIC. I hope the winner does get a refund but after a long drawn out process for being so slow. You always read everything on an eBay auction.
xUKHCx
Mar 23, 09:31 AM
IMO you don't leave a massively successful company after 22 years without a reason unless your retiring.
He did give a reason
."I've worked with Steve for 22 years and have had an incredible time developing products at both NeXT and Apple, but at this point, I want to focus less on products and more on science," said Bertrand Serlet
Like OMG, I had the craziest thought! What if MacRumors had more articles about...Mac Rumors?! Whoa whoa wee wow, that would be so cool.
*Face Palm.
Boring stuff.
MacRumors: Apple Mac Rumors and News You Care About.
Obviously you don't care about this but don't you think that the "senior vice president of Mac Software Engineering" who has been a part of previous keynote speechs consitutites news about Apple.
Serlet has occasionally appeared at Apple keynote and media events over the years to introduce Mac OS X-related features
He did give a reason
."I've worked with Steve for 22 years and have had an incredible time developing products at both NeXT and Apple, but at this point, I want to focus less on products and more on science," said Bertrand Serlet
Like OMG, I had the craziest thought! What if MacRumors had more articles about...Mac Rumors?! Whoa whoa wee wow, that would be so cool.
*Face Palm.
Boring stuff.
MacRumors: Apple Mac Rumors and News You Care About.
Obviously you don't care about this but don't you think that the "senior vice president of Mac Software Engineering" who has been a part of previous keynote speechs consitutites news about Apple.
Serlet has occasionally appeared at Apple keynote and media events over the years to introduce Mac OS X-related features
Clive At Five
Nov 29, 02:01 PM
Acting is hard. You only need to witness bad acting in one movie to understand this. For every A-list star, there are tens of thousands more out of work, because competition is tough and dependent on luck, too. But mostly, it comes down to supply and demand. I have no problems with actors getting 20 million a picture, they worked hard and there are only a handful of them, anyways.
luv ya bunches, x0x0x0
Your argument is kind of self-annihilating:
You say competition is tough... implying that there are a multitude of capable actors. i.e. Supply is high. This, in turn, would imply that capable actors are (or should be) a dime a dozen. However, Hollywood acts as though the A-List is all there is... which, if doing so, constricts supply to a significantly smaller population, therefore creating an artificially high demand for which they, subsequently, have to pay through the nose for... which WE now have to pay through the nose for. And for what? For a non-sensical, elitist, Movie Star ecosystem (an industry which alone brings in millions, if not billions).
If there are as many struggling good actors as you say there are (and I hope there are), I for one would LOVE to see them. I'm sick of the same 8 actors... Ben Stiller, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Julia Roberts, Owen Wilson, Vince Vaughn, Steve Carell, Johnny Depp... At least one of these seem to be in 90% of films these days. Some fresh blood would be nice... and easier on the checkbook.
-Clive
luv ya bunches, x0x0x0
Your argument is kind of self-annihilating:
You say competition is tough... implying that there are a multitude of capable actors. i.e. Supply is high. This, in turn, would imply that capable actors are (or should be) a dime a dozen. However, Hollywood acts as though the A-List is all there is... which, if doing so, constricts supply to a significantly smaller population, therefore creating an artificially high demand for which they, subsequently, have to pay through the nose for... which WE now have to pay through the nose for. And for what? For a non-sensical, elitist, Movie Star ecosystem (an industry which alone brings in millions, if not billions).
If there are as many struggling good actors as you say there are (and I hope there are), I for one would LOVE to see them. I'm sick of the same 8 actors... Ben Stiller, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Julia Roberts, Owen Wilson, Vince Vaughn, Steve Carell, Johnny Depp... At least one of these seem to be in 90% of films these days. Some fresh blood would be nice... and easier on the checkbook.
-Clive
Kieranic
Dec 6, 04:21 AM
Considering Christmas is just under 3 weeks away, I decided to switch to a Christmas wallpaper (will keep this for the rest of 2010) :)
I found this wallpaper about a year ago and it originally had the words "A South Park Christmas" at the bottom (which I digitally removed in iPhoto). It's amazing how fast 2010 has gone but then again, everyone says that every year :D
http://i.min.us/i9oUI.jpg
I found this wallpaper about a year ago and it originally had the words "A South Park Christmas" at the bottom (which I digitally removed in iPhoto). It's amazing how fast 2010 has gone but then again, everyone says that every year :D
http://i.min.us/i9oUI.jpg
Ambrose Chapel
Apr 4, 11:01 AM
You are obviously missing the point. Apple's new subscription model is preventing choice from coming to it's customers. How is that not a bad thing?
I think Apple's policy allows for users to opt-in to sharing their personal data.
I think Apple's policy allows for users to opt-in to sharing their personal data.
No comments:
Post a Comment