muhamm5
02-05 10:54 PM
I am on H-1 B , and planning to apply for Labor certification - working for an Automobile manufacturing Company in Engineering department,my qualifications are Bachelor in Mechanical Engineering-SOC CODE (17-2141), Masters in Industrial Engineering SOC CODE(17-2112).
Just want to ask can i use Commercial & Industrial designer SOC CODE(27-1021), as base cause for using this code is my current job responsibilities matches with it and also meeting Salary requirements, other two codes giving high salaries comparing this code - (flc data center),
By law do i have to use the same code in which my bachelor or master degree is OR it depends on my current job responsibility
. help will be appreciated
Just want to ask can i use Commercial & Industrial designer SOC CODE(27-1021), as base cause for using this code is my current job responsibilities matches with it and also meeting Salary requirements, other two codes giving high salaries comparing this code - (flc data center),
By law do i have to use the same code in which my bachelor or master degree is OR it depends on my current job responsibility
. help will be appreciated
wallpaper Again, think Jennifer Aniston
Administrator2
11-09 10:16 AM
That is may not correct. Stuart Anderson was never a lobbist. But he did play a key role in AC21 law. Back then Stuart was Legislative Director for Sen. Abraham (R-MI). Stuart worked with key staffers across the aisle to recapture and pass other favorable provisions in AC21. In that sense, Stuart always had a front row seat to witness things unfold in front of him. This is what makes his book so unique.
According to the website, Stuart is Adjunct Scholar at CATO institute and he is executive director of another policy institute called NFAP.
According to the website, Stuart is Adjunct Scholar at CATO institute and he is executive director of another policy institute called NFAP.
imh1b
10-26 08:44 AM
USCIS - USCIS Issues Two Precedent Appeals Decisions (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f8925403f0bcb210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
USCIS Issues Two Precedent Appeals Decisions
WASHINGTON�U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced that it has issued two decisions from the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as binding precedent for the agency. These decisions will provide guidance to USCIS adjudicators and help deliver predictability to the public. AAO precedent decisions result from a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which publishes the cases.
"The issuance of AAO precedent decisions honors USCIS�s commitment to the clear and consistent application of the immigration laws," said USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas. "We are grateful for the Justice Department�s partnership in our efforts to promote predictability in immigration-benefits cases." USCIS is committed to issuing further precedent decisions going forward, given their value to the agency and the public.
An AAO precedent decision is an immigration-appeals case that DHS, with the Attorney General�s concurrence, designates as establishing a rule for deciding future cases. Once published by DOJ, AAO precedent decisions bind all DHS personnel in the administration of the immigration laws. DOJ publishes the decisions in the bound volumes of the "Administrative Decisions Under Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States" (I&N Dec.), which also contain the precedent decisions of the DOJ�s Board of Immigration Appeals.
The first decision affirms USCIS�s denial of an application to adjust status to permanent residence and holds that an employment-based petition must be "valid" initially if it is to "remain valid with respect to a new job." The second decision reverses USCIS�s denial of an application to preserve residence for naturalization purposes and clarifies the definition of employment by an "American firm or corporation."
For more information on USCIS and its programs, visit USCIS Home Page (http://www.uscis.gov).
USCIS Issues Two Precedent Appeals Decisions
WASHINGTON�U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced that it has issued two decisions from the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as binding precedent for the agency. These decisions will provide guidance to USCIS adjudicators and help deliver predictability to the public. AAO precedent decisions result from a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which publishes the cases.
"The issuance of AAO precedent decisions honors USCIS�s commitment to the clear and consistent application of the immigration laws," said USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas. "We are grateful for the Justice Department�s partnership in our efforts to promote predictability in immigration-benefits cases." USCIS is committed to issuing further precedent decisions going forward, given their value to the agency and the public.
An AAO precedent decision is an immigration-appeals case that DHS, with the Attorney General�s concurrence, designates as establishing a rule for deciding future cases. Once published by DOJ, AAO precedent decisions bind all DHS personnel in the administration of the immigration laws. DOJ publishes the decisions in the bound volumes of the "Administrative Decisions Under Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States" (I&N Dec.), which also contain the precedent decisions of the DOJ�s Board of Immigration Appeals.
The first decision affirms USCIS�s denial of an application to adjust status to permanent residence and holds that an employment-based petition must be "valid" initially if it is to "remain valid with respect to a new job." The second decision reverses USCIS�s denial of an application to preserve residence for naturalization purposes and clarifies the definition of employment by an "American firm or corporation."
For more information on USCIS and its programs, visit USCIS Home Page (http://www.uscis.gov).
2011 Jennifer Aniston in Three
stemcell
03-03 10:49 PM
To all the physician members of this forum....
Conrad 30 program is up for extension on march 6.
According to shusterman.com although the extension is gonna take place, they plan to make physicians exempt from employment based category as long as they work in medically underserved areas....
If this bill includes the physician clause that will be a lifesaver for a lot of people and also help in visa retrogression albeit little bit.
Hope it passes....any thoughts anyone?
Conrad 30 program is up for extension on march 6.
According to shusterman.com although the extension is gonna take place, they plan to make physicians exempt from employment based category as long as they work in medically underserved areas....
If this bill includes the physician clause that will be a lifesaver for a lot of people and also help in visa retrogression albeit little bit.
Hope it passes....any thoughts anyone?
more...
wc_user
07-16 05:42 PM
Thanks for all your reply. I filed it online and then sent the photos and other requested documentation by mail. I'll wait for the RFE and will let you know what it is about.
srikondoji
04-11 04:58 PM
18000 change as of yesterday (April 10).
Enjoy:p
Enjoy:p
more...
hpandey
01-21 09:25 AM
If he went on vacation after getting the AP then ask him to use the AP to get back . He can still maintain his H1 status even if he comes back on AP.
2010 Jennifer Aniston 2010 received
Sunx_2004
03-24 11:58 AM
Its a good consolidated report, It clearly says system is broken and need a fix. Almost all the legislation listed at the end talk about either recapturing lost visas or increase the numerical limit.
Thanks
Check attachment.
Thanks
Check attachment.
more...
gc_chahiye
07-23 03:54 PM
Do we need to follow any process to convert from H1 to EAD? Or just apply for jobs using EAD?
you can apply for jobs using EAD, when you join the company on the I-9 form note that you are on EAD and provide the details there.
you can apply for jobs using EAD, when you join the company on the I-9 form note that you are on EAD and provide the details there.
hair jennifer aniston hair
waiting4gc02
02-28 12:44 PM
Guys:
I am in my 9th year and have applied for extension (3 yr, based on approved I-140).
Now if my wife were to go to India and in a couple of months apply for her
H4-Visa stamping in Delhi. What are the documents that she needs to carry ?
Thanks
I am in my 9th year and have applied for extension (3 yr, based on approved I-140).
Now if my wife were to go to India and in a couple of months apply for her
H4-Visa stamping in Delhi. What are the documents that she needs to carry ?
Thanks
more...
americandesi
04-11 04:20 PM
Guys
So, why is it no organization has tried this? or has this been tried before and failed..
This has been tried before by Rajiv Khanna and it was unsuccessful
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=223206&postcount=111
So, why is it no organization has tried this? or has this been tried before and failed..
This has been tried before by Rajiv Khanna and it was unsuccessful
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=223206&postcount=111
hot JENNIFER ANISTON photo
eb3_nepa
06-14 02:22 PM
Hi Guys
I have a few questions about what happens AFTER the I-485 is successfully filed?
How long before you get the notice to appear for finger printing?
How much time between getting the notice for Finger printing and the actual appointment?
When does the EAD come through and is there a way to expedite the EAD process?
When does the process go to the "name check" black hole and you informed about it?
Any other info by the experienced gurus will be appreciated
I have a few questions about what happens AFTER the I-485 is successfully filed?
How long before you get the notice to appear for finger printing?
How much time between getting the notice for Finger printing and the actual appointment?
When does the EAD come through and is there a way to expedite the EAD process?
When does the process go to the "name check" black hole and you informed about it?
Any other info by the experienced gurus will be appreciated
more...
house Jennifer Aniston#39;s style
GKBest
11-04 08:15 PM
We have the same notice date - 10/11 but my receipt date is 7/03. And I got my EAD on 10/26. They may be starting a system to process EAD/AP by receipt date. But still...who knows what they are doing it.
tattoo Jennifer Aniston,
mirchiseth
05-29 01:42 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18737
more...
pictures Celebrity Style: Jennifer
go_guy123
10-27 03:51 PM
Illinois Congressman: Immigration Reform Cannot Wait : NPR (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114199526)
President Obama says he wants to change United States immigration policy. But so far, immigration has taken a backseat to other pressing issues, like health care, the economic recession and the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. But Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois, wants to bump immigration to the top of the President's agenda. Gutierrez explains why he thinks comprehensive immigration reform cannot wait any longer.
Gutierrez is panicking on something that we already know: CIR is dying. As CIR gets delayed, its chances diminishes with the approaching election year (2010).
Gutierrez is from a high-immigrant area of Chicago (Cook County) but it will cost massively for Democratic party in the purple states. Democratic party will never
risk its fortunes over the tantrums of Gutierrez.
Gutierrez knows that if CIR keeps failing again and again then piecemeal will start gaining traction. Then his amnesty dreams for illegals will be up in smoke.
President Obama says he wants to change United States immigration policy. But so far, immigration has taken a backseat to other pressing issues, like health care, the economic recession and the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. But Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois, wants to bump immigration to the top of the President's agenda. Gutierrez explains why he thinks comprehensive immigration reform cannot wait any longer.
Gutierrez is panicking on something that we already know: CIR is dying. As CIR gets delayed, its chances diminishes with the approaching election year (2010).
Gutierrez is from a high-immigrant area of Chicago (Cook County) but it will cost massively for Democratic party in the purple states. Democratic party will never
risk its fortunes over the tantrums of Gutierrez.
Gutierrez knows that if CIR keeps failing again and again then piecemeal will start gaining traction. Then his amnesty dreams for illegals will be up in smoke.
dresses Jennifer Aniston wears
imconfused
05-27 08:46 AM
any help?
more...
makeup Jennifer Aniston out and about
raj3078
05-09 09:35 AM
Is there anything being done by IV for 3rd part?
girlfriend Jennifer Aniston
Ann Ruben
07-17 05:16 PM
You can use the approved I-140 from company A to get a 3 year H-1 for company B assuming your priority date is not current. However, because you have not been working for company A, you are technically not in valid non-immigrant H status and though Company B's H-1 petition should be approved for three years, the extension may not be granted. This means that at some point you would have to leave, get a new H visa and then return.
hairstyles Jennifer Aniston, Kate
frostrated
12-01 04:25 PM
you cannot file two 485s. what you can do is get till the 140 stage, and then port the old 485 to your 140.
roseball
01-07 02:10 PM
Anybody who had an I94 issued only till the validity of the visa and not until the I-797? At the POE the guy simply wouldn't understand when I tried to explain to him that I have an extension (797) valid from 4/10 t0 4/11. He gave me an I94 only until 4/10. I read that people go for deffered inspection and get it corrected. Anybody who did that in a similar situation active in IV now? Any suggestions on how to proceed? do you go to the nearest international airport or an off-airport location?
Its common for IOs at POE to do this. Their side of the explanation is that they cannot give you an I-94 based on a I-797 which will be valid in the future. They have to go with a currently valid document. Like others suggested, you will have to either re-enter US immediately after the current I-94 expires or go to the nearest intl airport and get this done by defferred inspection.
Its common for IOs at POE to do this. Their side of the explanation is that they cannot give you an I-94 based on a I-797 which will be valid in the future. They have to go with a currently valid document. Like others suggested, you will have to either re-enter US immediately after the current I-94 expires or go to the nearest intl airport and get this done by defferred inspection.
indianabacklog
03-22 11:22 PM
Hello everybody ! I am 22 years old. My parents had applied for GC under the employment based category. I, unfortunately, aged out before my parents applied I-140 because of the stupid backlogs. So I aged out even before an I-140 was filed. I was reading the Child protection act info and could not understand if I will be "automatically classified to the appropriate category" for GC which is Family 2B and retain my "original PD." Does this apply to me as I had not even filed I-140 when I aged out ? My parent's PD is Oct 2000 so does this mean I am under Family 2B with Oct 2000 PD ?? Please help me out. I am sure many of you with sons/daughters that are in a similar situation. Thanks
My son also aged out before my I140 was filed. I was told that he would not be able to keep the same priority date and it would be fixed by the date when I could apply for his family based application. So, if I were to file an I130 next week his priority date would be March 2008.
In order for the priority date to be fixed at the point when labor certification was applied for the I140 would have to be submitted before his 21st birthday and be approved within a time period that could be deducted from his age at time of approval, making him under 21 at that time.
The child status protection act is pretty useless to children in your position or my son's since the big delay occurred in the labor cert stage.
If however, you can find a different interpretation of this situation feel free to send me a personal message and I will follow through as well.
There are a number of members in IV whose children aged out so while this is not a prevalent subject matter it is one that affects more people than you might realize.
My son also aged out before my I140 was filed. I was told that he would not be able to keep the same priority date and it would be fixed by the date when I could apply for his family based application. So, if I were to file an I130 next week his priority date would be March 2008.
In order for the priority date to be fixed at the point when labor certification was applied for the I140 would have to be submitted before his 21st birthday and be approved within a time period that could be deducted from his age at time of approval, making him under 21 at that time.
The child status protection act is pretty useless to children in your position or my son's since the big delay occurred in the labor cert stage.
If however, you can find a different interpretation of this situation feel free to send me a personal message and I will follow through as well.
There are a number of members in IV whose children aged out so while this is not a prevalent subject matter it is one that affects more people than you might realize.
No comments:
Post a Comment