cagedcactus
10-19 09:08 AM
Welcome to the Land of the freeeeeeee.
They call it Democracy....
They call it Democracy....
wallpaper Lil Wayne – Hot Revolver
sweet_jungle
11-13 12:33 AM
Has anybody tried getting an FP by walking in at an ASC? If you have waited really long enough, will the ASC entertain you if you produce them the I-485 receipts?
meridiani.planum
07-23 05:34 AM
All,
Now that Aug is coming up, please post all the 485 LUDs that you have been seeing after 07/18/2008. This will help us getting the pattern, in case USCIS shall auto order the Card production.
no one is auto-ordering card production (whatever that means).
lets stick with vdlrao's thread to track Augusts approvals please. no need for another thread for teh same topic.
Now that Aug is coming up, please post all the 485 LUDs that you have been seeing after 07/18/2008. This will help us getting the pattern, in case USCIS shall auto order the Card production.
no one is auto-ordering card production (whatever that means).
lets stick with vdlrao's thread to track Augusts approvals please. no need for another thread for teh same topic.
2011 Women#39;s: Lil Wayne - Hot
Blog Feeds
10-29 05:40 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
Today's Wall Street Journal has their main front page article on how H-1B quotas have not been used up yet and argues that the market should dictate the numbers rather than Government quotas.
Arbitrary quotas have been ruled unconstitutional by all courts in every domestic affairs except for immigration law. You cannot have quotas for segregation or desegregation, for diversity in public education. You cannot have quotas at workplace. We read in Law School that quotas inherently violate due process. But I had to throw my constitution down my office window when I started practicing immigration law.
When the colonists came to America, there was no problem, no quotas. White Anglo Saxon Protestants could simply come and work. Then as more and more Italians and Chinese came in, restrictions began to be put in from 1875 onwards. Chinese were banned because they were "Coolie labor" for lewd and immoral purposes. After World War 1, the Congress restricted immigration to 2% of their nationality already settled in America. Since there were no non white people in the US at that time, most of Asia and Africa was shut out from the US. This was done to preserve the racial mix in the United States. Since then a lot of restrictive immigration Acts establishing arbitrary quotas were enacted and still valid today. The Permanent Residency Process has quotas in both Employment based and Family Immigration. So does the H-1B program for bringing in the brightest and the best.
These quotas have risen from anti Immigration and Xenophobic attitudes prevalent in America. As the Wall Street Journal points out, why should a very bright person from say India or China come to the US to be treated as a second class citizen, at the bottom of the social ladder? They would rather stay in their own country which are emerging economies. Yet, as the WSJ articles point out, 35% of Microsoft patents were developed by immigrants, and the person who developed Google News was an H-1B from India.
Those patents will just go to India, and someday the children or grandchildren of these anti immigration forces will seek immigration to India.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3113598453464852981?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/10/quotas-in-immigration-law.html)
Today's Wall Street Journal has their main front page article on how H-1B quotas have not been used up yet and argues that the market should dictate the numbers rather than Government quotas.
Arbitrary quotas have been ruled unconstitutional by all courts in every domestic affairs except for immigration law. You cannot have quotas for segregation or desegregation, for diversity in public education. You cannot have quotas at workplace. We read in Law School that quotas inherently violate due process. But I had to throw my constitution down my office window when I started practicing immigration law.
When the colonists came to America, there was no problem, no quotas. White Anglo Saxon Protestants could simply come and work. Then as more and more Italians and Chinese came in, restrictions began to be put in from 1875 onwards. Chinese were banned because they were "Coolie labor" for lewd and immoral purposes. After World War 1, the Congress restricted immigration to 2% of their nationality already settled in America. Since there were no non white people in the US at that time, most of Asia and Africa was shut out from the US. This was done to preserve the racial mix in the United States. Since then a lot of restrictive immigration Acts establishing arbitrary quotas were enacted and still valid today. The Permanent Residency Process has quotas in both Employment based and Family Immigration. So does the H-1B program for bringing in the brightest and the best.
These quotas have risen from anti Immigration and Xenophobic attitudes prevalent in America. As the Wall Street Journal points out, why should a very bright person from say India or China come to the US to be treated as a second class citizen, at the bottom of the social ladder? They would rather stay in their own country which are emerging economies. Yet, as the WSJ articles point out, 35% of Microsoft patents were developed by immigrants, and the person who developed Google News was an H-1B from India.
Those patents will just go to India, and someday the children or grandchildren of these anti immigration forces will seek immigration to India.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3113598453464852981?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/10/quotas-in-immigration-law.html)
more...
resident
04-14 01:35 PM
Hello,
I have previously contacted an attorney from NY which has been very successful with O-1 visa applications. He has helped two people I know and apparently has a 100% success rate (I suppose that could come from only choosing cases he's sure will go through). This attorney has reviewed my CV and stated I certainly qualify for the O-1 visa. This guy is also very expensive.
My employer is willing to pay for all visa expenses, as long as it's through their own law firm (which charges about $5000 less than the NY guy). So my question is: as long as the CV is strong, is it possible an attorney could screw up the application, by not preparing it very well? Basically, I am trying to decided whether I should suggest to my employer eating up the cost difference so that I can work with the guy from NY.
Any advice welcome.
Thanks!
I have previously contacted an attorney from NY which has been very successful with O-1 visa applications. He has helped two people I know and apparently has a 100% success rate (I suppose that could come from only choosing cases he's sure will go through). This attorney has reviewed my CV and stated I certainly qualify for the O-1 visa. This guy is also very expensive.
My employer is willing to pay for all visa expenses, as long as it's through their own law firm (which charges about $5000 less than the NY guy). So my question is: as long as the CV is strong, is it possible an attorney could screw up the application, by not preparing it very well? Basically, I am trying to decided whether I should suggest to my employer eating up the cost difference so that I can work with the guy from NY.
Any advice welcome.
Thanks!
lonemetro
08-11 07:04 PM
Dear Friends,
I finally got my RIR/EB-3 approved. My lawyer just mailed out EB-3/I-140. Now, our parent company is trying to transfer me there to work for them. Because the parent company has totally different name and tax id, that means I will need to start from H1B-PERM-I140 all over again.
If I start working for the parent company before the current EB-3/I-140 gets approved, will I still be able to use its Priority Date when I apply for the new EB-2/I-140 under parentcompany? What if the parent company decide to close down my current company before EB-3/I-140 gets approved, will that I-140 still be valid?
Any input is welcome and appreciated.
Thanks much!
I finally got my RIR/EB-3 approved. My lawyer just mailed out EB-3/I-140. Now, our parent company is trying to transfer me there to work for them. Because the parent company has totally different name and tax id, that means I will need to start from H1B-PERM-I140 all over again.
If I start working for the parent company before the current EB-3/I-140 gets approved, will I still be able to use its Priority Date when I apply for the new EB-2/I-140 under parentcompany? What if the parent company decide to close down my current company before EB-3/I-140 gets approved, will that I-140 still be valid?
Any input is welcome and appreciated.
Thanks much!
more...
gc_on_demand
05-27 12:15 PM
Aha I see ... yes she can stay in the US beyond the I-94 date as long as the extension application is pending. From the postings i can recollect that in case of a denial the unlawful presence starts from the decision date.
also if you get denial stamp no longer be valid. This is what I also read online.
also if you get denial stamp no longer be valid. This is what I also read online.
2010 lil wayne rebirth
chakkaradeep
09-22 02:04 AM
Ok, to make things complex,
Here is my sample. I just have a TextBox and Label - both bound to a FriendsName Class which implements INotifyPropertyChanged
I have set the UpdateSourceTrigger to PropertyChanged and thus whenever I type something in the TextBox, my Label gets updated then and there.
Now, What I want to do is, I want to have a Button, say Update and when I click that , the data should update the source and thus result the change in the Label. So, its like, after I complete typing in the TextBox, click on the Update Button, the Label should not be updated with the value :D
Hope I am clear :(
I would be really happy if someone help me :)
Thanks,
Here is my sample. I just have a TextBox and Label - both bound to a FriendsName Class which implements INotifyPropertyChanged
I have set the UpdateSourceTrigger to PropertyChanged and thus whenever I type something in the TextBox, my Label gets updated then and there.
Now, What I want to do is, I want to have a Button, say Update and when I click that , the data should update the source and thus result the change in the Label. So, its like, after I complete typing in the TextBox, click on the Update Button, the Label should not be updated with the value :D
Hope I am clear :(
I would be really happy if someone help me :)
Thanks,
more...
Almond
07-20 09:32 PM
They expire after a certain amount of time. Just go take them as they want you to. You don't want anything to get delayed in the future just because you don't want to be bothered with them today.
hair Lil Wayne – On Fire (prod.
stephsh
01-18 07:48 AM
I tried using the way you proposed but it doesnt work, presumably since I�m using ASP.net and not silverlight.
more...
ranand00
07-13 03:57 PM
i am on h4 and this was the first time a company filed for my h1b. so would that be ok if company "B" files for my h1b with h1b filed with company "A" is pending with RFE.
hot ATL LINK: Lil Wayne – Hot
gc_lover
06-27 01:20 PM
Can i file for I-485 while my H1-B extension petition is pending?
Should i premium process my H1-B petition before i can be ready to file my I-485 in july?
Thanks
sri
Yes...you can file. Those are completely seperate process.
Should i premium process my H1-B petition before i can be ready to file my I-485 in july?
Thanks
sri
Yes...you can file. Those are completely seperate process.
more...
house new lil wayne hot revolver
kavas
03-31 10:12 AM
why do u think so rajesh..most the senators R and D are speaking of their own immigrant experiences andsupporting illegals.
even if the bill passes ,we r not getting much relief if in eb3.we should be trying for a amendment to remove country cap or file i-485.time is slipping from our hand s though and only lobbyist can do anything at this point
even if the bill passes ,we r not getting much relief if in eb3.we should be trying for a amendment to remove country cap or file i-485.time is slipping from our hand s though and only lobbyist can do anything at this point
tattoo Kevin Rudolf – Hot Revolver
http404
07-18 12:03 AM
And what if filed a concurrent I-140 and I-485.
Though this is my second I-140 and I am trying to capture an old priority date (and I do have the receipt from the old I-140).
Though this is my second I-140 and I am trying to capture an old priority date (and I do have the receipt from the old I-140).
more...
pictures Hot Revolver by Lil Wayne
kavas
03-31 10:12 AM
why do u think so rajesh..most the senators R and D are speaking of their own immigrant experiences andsupporting illegals.
even if the bill passes ,we r not getting much relief if in eb3.we should be trying for a amendment to remove country cap or file i-485.time is slipping from our hand s though and only lobbyist can do anything at this point
even if the bill passes ,we r not getting much relief if in eb3.we should be trying for a amendment to remove country cap or file i-485.time is slipping from our hand s though and only lobbyist can do anything at this point
dresses Lil Wayne - Hot Revolver (wH.Sick) (Rebirth) NeW * 2009
Prashanthi
07-06 05:37 PM
your employer has to update your I-9 form with the EAD documentation, you need AP for travel only, you will not be deported if you change to EAD.
more...
makeup Lil#39; Wayne gets his Kanye West
lagsam
05-20 04:07 PM
That's right, still AOS.
You can renew within 120 days before the EAD expire.
I just renewed mine and my wife. My daughter is 16 and she's AOS, but don't have EAD. I am planning to apply for her EAD next month.
You can renew within 120 days before the EAD expire.
I just renewed mine and my wife. My daughter is 16 and she's AOS, but don't have EAD. I am planning to apply for her EAD next month.
girlfriend Lil Wayne – Hot Revolver
NolaIndian32
07-24 11:39 AM
I agree - hiring your own attorney would be the best option if money is not an issue.
hairstyles Check out the “Hot Revolver”
leoindiano
02-04 02:32 PM
Congrats,
contact your lawyer... We are talking about your entry into US. Also, pls. delete other 2 duplicate threads.
contact your lawyer... We are talking about your entry into US. Also, pls. delete other 2 duplicate threads.
dngoyal
08-17 02:45 PM
I applied for 485/EAD/AP in the month of June'2007.
I got the receipt and my finger printing is done.
Now my EAD/AP?485 are in pending approval stage.
At this time, I need to travel out of country for urgent reasons,
how it will work.
I have H1B stamped on my passport which is valid till March'2010.
Is it OK to travel on this H1B and re-enter or as my finger printing is done, I am already on AOS status.
Please help.
I got the receipt and my finger printing is done.
Now my EAD/AP?485 are in pending approval stage.
At this time, I need to travel out of country for urgent reasons,
how it will work.
I have H1B stamped on my passport which is valid till March'2010.
Is it OK to travel on this H1B and re-enter or as my finger printing is done, I am already on AOS status.
Please help.
JunRN
09-26 02:38 PM
That remains to be seen. Congress cannot act in a mere speculation that there will be spierce competition between EU and US on skilled labor. US still attracts a lot of foreign skills. Increasing the number is not always seen as a solution but streamlining is or efficiency in adjudication is.
Anothe problem is that US thought it is adding more into the work force everyyear by giving out immigrant visas (EB). This is wrong because most of the applicants are already in the workforce under H1B and their dependents. What EB visas do was to retain these foreign skills by giving them permanent residence status. Therefore, EB visas are there not to add into the workforce but to maintain the current workforce.
The real visas for adding into the workforce is the H1B, which is temporary and only 65,000 per year which in a week time was used up.
Anothe problem is that US thought it is adding more into the work force everyyear by giving out immigrant visas (EB). This is wrong because most of the applicants are already in the workforce under H1B and their dependents. What EB visas do was to retain these foreign skills by giving them permanent residence status. Therefore, EB visas are there not to add into the workforce but to maintain the current workforce.
The real visas for adding into the workforce is the H1B, which is temporary and only 65,000 per year which in a week time was used up.
No comments:
Post a Comment